Joseph says:
Again, it’s business and Apple can’t allow others to piggyback off of Apple trademarks. The Cisco case is a bad example because the value of Cisco’s ‘iPhone’ trademark comes no where close to Apple’s ‘iPod’ trademark – note that Apple essentially won that argument as proved by the fact that it used and uses ‘iPhone’.
And not all Apple fans have double standards. If Bill Gates told a developer to change the name of an app called MSWordRip because it violates and MS trademark, I’d have no complaints.
